Showing posts with label species. Show all posts
Showing posts with label species. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 4, 2023

Could Adam Write? (Mark of Cain)


 

Were Adam and Eve capable of writing as soon as they were created?  Could they read the mark of Cain?  First, keep in mind that Adam was made perfect and was very intelligent.  He named all the “beasts of the field” and birds in one day (Gen. 2:19)!  This involves natural kinds or Essential Types of Life (ETL's).  This is quite unlike the modern “species” concept - it is a much broader category.   In the words of folk poet Bob Dylan (81 yo), “Man gave names to all the animals, in the beginning, long time ago” from the album Slow Train Coming.

 

We read in Genesis 5:1, “This is the written account of Adam’s line.”  Who better than Adam, who lived 930 years, to compile the earth’s primeval history - he was an eyewitness!  The New Testament explicitly states that Moses wrote the last four books of the Pentateuch, but not Genesis.  Maybe Moses edited Genesis from previously existing sources.

 

What was the mark of Cain?  Cain slew Abel, so he was a marked man.  God protected Cain by putting a mark on him (Gen. 4:15).  God told Cain that if anyone harms him then the attacker will suffer “seven times over” (cf. Gen. 4:24).   It seems this was the basic message of the mark which would reasonably have been put on his forehead (cf. Ez. 9:4).  A tattoo on his shoulder would not have been seen before a spear pierced his heart.  Try to put this message in symbols!  My attempt is XC=>OX7x (kill Cain implies God, the circle means infinity, kills you seven times).  Thus, the children of Eve were able to read the mark God put on Cain.

 

Writing does not take thousands of years to develop.  Sequoyah (d. 1843), who could neither read nor write in English, developed the Cherokee syllabary in four years![1]  These include H=“mi” and A=“go.”  Writing in the ancient world was quite widespread.  The Native Americans of Alaska had a kind of “picture writing.”[2]  A horizontal line with two slants above and two below represent a boat with two people and two oars.

 

The Mayan alphabet contains 27 symbols and was made known to the Western world in the 1500‘s.[3]  This system was not deciphered until the 1950’s through the work of Yuri Knorosov and others.[4]  This just shows how advanced the ancients were since it took so long to unravel it!  Some letters require more than one symbol.  This may be analogous to the fact that we use two letters for the “th” sound but in Greek one letter is used (Θ, theta).

 

A discovery at Blombos Cave, 200 miles east of Cape Town, South Africa showed a culture that used symbolic marks.[5]  They also found ocher, probably used for body paint.  What is amazing is that this site is dated at 73,000 years old!  We do not accept this date, but wish to emphasize that early cultures used writing.

 

My books challenge Darwin and Deep Time:

https://totalyouth.us/

My video on Deep Time from the West Texas oilpatch:

https://youtu.be/B-UqMP3_z9k

 

The origin of writing began with Adam.  Eve and Adam could write!  Adam was indeed literate.  The history of writing starts with the mark of Cain.  The first literacy program was God given.

 

Notes:

1) A Study of Writing by I. J. Gelb (Univ. of Chicago Press, 2e, 1963), pp. 206, 207.

2) Ibid., p.34.

3) Ibid., p.54.

4) "Ancient Mayan writing - A brief history of Mayan scripts" by Claudia Zehrt:  

https://www.bl.uk/history-of-writing/articles/ancient-maya-writing

5) "The earliest drawing sheds light on the origin of symbolism" (#L13) by Karen van Niekerk (9-12-18):

https://ecoevocommunity.nature.com/posts/38511-the-earliest-drawing-sheds-light-on-the-origin-of-symbolism

 

#NaturalKinds #EssentialTypesOfLife #ETLs #Mayan #Sequoyah #GeorgeGuess #GuessWho #Cherokee #YuriKnorosov #L13 #Blombos #Date73K #OriginalWriting #AdamCouldWrite #NativeAmerican #Genesis #MarkOfCain #BobDylan #species #SlowTrain #Pentateuch #tattoo #Moses

Wednesday, September 8, 2021

Biological Essentialism - The New Book that will Smash the Darwinian Tower of Babel

 


Biological Essentialism tackles Aristotle, UnDarwinism, human nature, worldview, bias, renegade scientists, Dawkins vs. Dawkins, natural kinds, gender confusion and geology among other topics.

This controversial work is fully illustrated with hundreds of graphics and the innovative ideas are well documented with over 500 reference notes.

Biological essentialism holds that there exists Essential Types of Life (ETL's), such as bears and penguins - these are distinct kinds of organisms that do not have a common ancestor and organic variation has limits.

Would you like to learn more about human exceptionalism, the fruit of evolution and the meaning of life?  If so, this book is for you!

Get your copy today:

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/biological-essentialism-jay-hall/1140135320


Friday, May 8, 2020

What is Biological Essentialism?


If you search "biological essentialism" you will run into gender issues which is not the main topic for this video.  Former co-anchor of ABC's 2020, John Stossel, did a cool video on "The Science: Male Brain vs Female Brain."

The larger academic and historical meaning of "biological essentialism" is that manatees make more manatees and that acorns give us oak trees and not pines.  Here's our latest video.  Some key terms to keep in mind:
  
  •    biological essentialism
  •    species
  •    fixity of species
  •    natural kinds
  •    Aristotle's biology
  •    typology
  •    stasis


Chapter nine of my latest book, Is a Young Earth Possible?, deals with biological essentialism.  Aristotle's Biology is highlighted on an episode of In Our Time with Melvyn Bragg (BBC).  You can see the great pics of living fossils from Harun Yahya here.  If a fern has stayed the same for 300M, maybe it has always been a fern and was never derived from more primitive forms.  Gregor Mendel, the Father of Genetics, who died in 1884, actually denied evolution.

Colin Patterson was a senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History and the editor of  its journal.  He was at the Museum 1962 until 1993.  Although retired at the age of sixty, he continued to work daily in the Museum until his sudden death in 1998.  Patterson asks in his last book Evolution (see Steven Propp review):

Are we justified… in making the leap from small-scale changes like selection in peppered moths… to large-scale results such as the existence of elephants and oak trees?  Some evolutionists … have felt that the original appearance of birds, or land vertebrates… requires innovations that cannot be satisfactorily explained by gradual, small-scale changes.  So they have supposed that major innovations arise at one step, by large-scale… macromutations… The main reason for inventing these macromutations is that some features of plants and animals can hardly be imagined as arising in gradual steps… intermediate steps seem to be useless, or even harmful… What use are feathers unless then are ‘proper’ feathers?  What use is a lung that is half-developed, and cannot give you enough oxygen?  How can the segmentation of an … earthworm or a centipede arise bit by bit?  An animal is either segmented or it is not…

Ask a three-year-old if there are prime numbers with more than 100 digits.  To prove the point, all I need to do is give one example.  It's as easy as 1-2-3!
Likewise, for Essential Types of Life (ETL's), humans and horses (zebras, donkeys, 3-toed ...) are two examples.  Laura Franklin-Hall (Philo Prof @ NYU) said,

... these differ [variations on essentialism] on whether there are thought to be multiple, possibly cross-cutting, types of natural kinds of a particular sort, such as multiple varieties of biological species - e.g., genealogical and morphological.  Another choice-point for the realist concerns the thesis of essentialism, the view that members of a natural kind share a real essence - perhaps a locus of de re modality.  As I understand things, essentialism is not a requirement of realism itself, but rather reflects a particular way of spelling out the realist vision.

In Tom Wolfe's last book, The Kingdom of Speech, he rejected evolution.  Wolfe wrote The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test (1968), The New Journalism (1973), The Right Stuff (1979) and From Bauhaus to Our House (1981) among many other works.  Dogmatic Darwinists cannot explain the origin of human language and abstract thought.

As we end this investigation into "bio-ess" let's deal with these probing questions: 
Are all the animals in the zoo in the same cage?
Do whales bury their dead?
What if Darwin was wrong?
Could biological essentialism truly represent the actual biological realm?

my website >>  TotalYouth.us
contact:  YoungEarthScience@yahoo.com
#biology #essentialism #species #fixity #NaturalKinds #Aristotle #typology #stasis